Compare → CyberMind CLI vs PentAGI
CyberMind CLI vs PentAGI
Two agentic AI security tools — an honest, detailed comparison for 2026.
5
CyberMind wins
7
Ties
3
PentAGI wins
Feature
CyberMind CLI
PentAGI
Architecture
CLI + cloud backend
Docker multi-agent system
Install complexity
✅ One command
❌ Docker Compose required
Windows support
✅ Full (AI chat, scan, OSINT)
❌ Linux/Docker only
Bug bounty focus
✅ HackerOne/Bugcrowd integration
❌ Not designed for bug bounty
Multi-agent system
✅ 16 specialist agents
✅ Specialized agents
Long-term memory
✅ Per-target JSON + knowledge graph
✅ pgvector semantic memory
Knowledge graph
✅ Cross-target intel
✅ Graphiti KG
Free tier
✅ 20 req/day free
✅ Open source (self-host)
VSCode extension
✅ Yes
❌ No
Web dashboard
✅ cybermindcli.com
✅ Self-hosted web UI
Telegram notifications
✅ Bug found alerts
❌ No
GitHub stars
⚠️ Growing
✅ 538 stars
Browser agent
⚠️ Coming soon
✅ Yes
Observability
⚠️ Basic
✅ Grafana + Prometheus + Jaeger
Pricing
✅ Free + ₹299/mo
✅ Free (self-host)
Verdict
CyberMind CLI wins on accessibility — one-command install, Windows support, bug bounty integration, and VSCode extension. PentAGI wins on infrastructure — Docker-based isolation, pgvector memory, and observability stack. Choose CyberMind if you want to start immediately on any OS. Choose PentAGI if you have a Linux server and want self-hosted infrastructure.